Archive for the ‘STM Publishing’ Category

Get that guy to the PDF — ASAP!

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011 by Autumn Jones

As the cost of paper and ink continue to rise, the nation continues to emphasize “green” initiatives, and people are increasingly turning to portable devices for their reading preferences, a lot of Scientific Technical and Medical publishers are moving journals and publications into PDFs, instead of expending the money to print them.

Part of the allure of PDF publications, aside from the cost benefit for the association, is the ease of access.  PDFs can be saved and stored to desktops, laptops, tablets, and smartphones, and are, for the most part, universally accessible across operating systems.  With over 83% of STM publications and journals now available online (and growing!), libraries are able to continue to stock all of the scholarly research on which the scientists report without having to sacrifice publications because of budget.  The speed of delivery is almost instantaneous, and there are more advanced metrics on just who is reading the publications.

Some are apprehensive about the decrease in price at which the journals can be sold, but this is handily accounted for by the significant decrease in printing costs. Journals can become living documents, constantly updated, linked from one to the next, able to be condensed or expanded to suit individual readers’ needs.

Concerns around open access can be assuaged by validation practices that require logging in or entering an authentication code when trying to access articles from mobile devices. This allows even more metrics to be reported back to the publisher, but also allows for customization by users for a better overall experience.

PDFs allow the publisher to maintain control over the work, while allowing the reader to carry it along and search the document with ease.  And, if downloads translate into purchases, the business model around journals is unharmed.  As the industry and the nation continue to move into the digital age, print publications are increasingly becoming “print to file” publications.

Has the “Eureka!” Disappeared with the Print Copy in STM Publishing?

Thursday, March 10th, 2011 by Autumn Jones

By Megan Stevens

At many scientific association conferences I have attended on behalf of an STM publisher, I’ve heard the same refrain from many older scientists: “With all this online content, the serendipitous discovery of new techniques or innovations that could be applied to other disciplines is lost!”Apparently, being able to down-select immediately on the journal’s homepage or subscribe to a discipline-specific RSS feed is causing the downfall of the STM world. And the publishers are to blame!

It may be true that young scientists are no longer sitting down in large cushy armchairs and leafing through cross-disciplinary journals (in print). These young whippersnappers just pull out their laptops and do a keyword search when they need an article. Though search features and well-categorized websites have eliminated most of the aimless paper flipping, I would argue that there is a different place that provides the desired chance encounters. Social media.

As of March 3rd :

  • the Science Facebook page had 31,773 “likes”
  • @Sciencemagazine had 14,701 followers on Twitter
  • the Nature Facebook page had 34,546 “likes”
  • @NatureNews had 133,271 followers on Twitter

Look at those numbers. That’s a lot of people who are being notified every time these publishers tweet (each averages more than 4 times a day).  I can’t provide the number of click-throughs generated, but I can promise that if it wasn’t working ,they wouldn’t be doing it.

What these older scientists don’t realize is that most STM publishers have a very strong social media presence, just like the younger scientists do. They write about interesting articles they publish, links included, so that anyone who views the page can see a list of highlighted articles and click straight to them. People go there to read up on the new stuff, make comments and ask questions. The community built online is probably even better at generating such opportune insights. Young scientists are still as interested in the goings-on in other disciplines—they just prefer to find out about them on their smart phones. And the publishers get that.

Megan Stevens is a graduate student in the Publishing program at The George Washington University.


Modernizing STM communications

Tuesday, March 8th, 2011 by user

By Dawn Glossa, MPA

Scientific, technical and medical communications are consistently a challenge to interest consumer media.  My team has been able to implement a successful press program with our scientific journal by:

  • Working with our editorial board to identify upcoming abstracts that may interest the general public (No animal studies).
  • Writing press release that are attractive to the consumer media—easy to understand and making it real with patient connected stories.
  • Actively reaching out the consumer media outlets—getting them used to knowing us.

It has been a long road, but we see pick up each month from our releases.  Our members are happy and the public is starting to see anesthesiology in a different light.

Dawn Glossa is the Director of Communications at the American Society of Anesthesiologists. The association’s weekly newsletter, ASAP, has a 25% read rate, and the association won a bronze award in the Association TRENDS All Media Contest for its annual report.